Posts tagged ‘Movie Reviews’
This isn’t going to be a detailed review.
I saw The Dark Knight Rises alone because neither my wife nor daughters wished to see it, even though my girls love Joseph Gordon-Levitt. They weren’t excited by the trailers and after the Colorado shooting, weren’t even willing to see it just for dear old Dad.
It’s a very good movie. Not as good as The Avengers, I’d rank it about the same as The Amazing Spider-man except that I’m more interested in seeing Spidey a second time in the theater. I not sure exactly why, except that I had lower expectations for Spider-man and he exceeded them while I had high expectations for TDKR and he didn’t quite meet them.
Now I loved The Dark Knight. I saw it a couple of times in the theater including once in IMAX. But TDKR has no one to match Heath Ledger’s Joker. I also think there were too many characters in TDKR and we didn’t get to spend enough time with them. If you read my review of The Amazing Spider-man, I explained how less is more. Few characters means we get a better feel for them.
In The Dark Knight Rises, we have: Bruce/Batman, Alfred, Gordon, Selena/Catwoman, Bane, Fox, Blake, Miranda, Foley, Daggat, Stryver and the two guys in the pit. Each of these characters had significant dialogue and multiple scenes. They could have dropped Foley, comgined Daggat and Stryver into a single character and combined the two guys in the pit into a single character without changing the plot one bit.
There were also several scenes that pulled me out of the movie which is never a good thing.
So I do recommend it, but not as highly as I would have liked.
We just watched this movie and were very pleasantly surprised. When I think of Cuba Gooding, Jr., I think of his Oscar for Jerry MaGuire back in 1996 followed by Snow Dogs in 2002. He actually made quite a few movies in between, but that had been the impression. It’s a shame because The Hit List shows that he can be a dynamite villain.
The movie focuses on Cole Hauser, an engineer expecting a promotion at work and married to a wife he adores. We also find out that he borrowed some money from the wrong kind of people and really needs the promotion in order to repay the loan. Of course, if that had happened this would have been an entirely different movie.
Instead Hauser loses out on the promotion to a slimy coworker and arrives home in time to find his wife in a negligee and his best friend buttoning up his shirt. It seems he’s been so focused on getting ahead in the world that they’ve grown apart. She wants to talk, but he leaves for a motel. On the way, he stops at a bar where he meets Cuba and gets drunk.
Cuba admits to our protagonist that he is a professional killer. Hauser thinks its a joke and is persuaded to make a list of 5 people he wants dead: his boss, his slimy coworker, his loan shark, his ex-best friend and his estranged wife. He then takes a bathroom break and when he returns, Cuba is gone.
When Hauser arrives at work the next morning after sleeping in his car, he learns that his boss has been murdered … and the race is on.
Hauser is solid as the normal guy in over his head. Cuba is amazing as the unstoppable killing machine and very reminiscent of Tom Cruise in Collateral.
I recommend The Hit List as an above average thriller and a chance to see Cuba Gooding, Jr. in a different light.
I will give it a full review this weekend, but I saw this movie with the family tonight. My wife and youngest had already seen it and my oldest has seen it twice.
It was good. Highly recommend it.
So I read the reviews (pro and con) and procrastinated as long as I could, but when my wife and youngest daughter both expressed an interest, I couldn’t put it off any longer. We went to see John Carter (of Mars) on Saturday. I didn’t spring for the 3D version, preferring to spend my money on sodas and popcorn instead.
I liked it … quite a bit. My wife liked it okay. My 13 year old loved it and wanted to see it again while my 15 year old hated it and complained all the way home.
A number of reviewers were outraged at the liberties taken with the story. If you could point to a single movie that didn’t have significant changes from the book, I might understand that complaint. But overall, John Carter is remarkably consistent with A Princess of Mars. Yes, they made changes, but at least a loyal fan could tell that this movie was based on the Burrough’s book – unlike I, Robot which had more in common with Jack Williamson’s Humanoids series than anything Asimov wrote. And despite one idiotic reviewer, the movie producers stayed faithful to the names and language of the original and didn’t violate Heinlein’s prohibition (which he broke himself) on Martians named Smith.
Carter is still a former Confederate officer from Virginia. He mines for gold and get chased by Apaches. The movie provides a less metaphysical method to transport Carter to Mars. Tars Tarkus is still 10 feet tall, green and has four arms. Yes, Tars is now Jeddak of Thark from the start rather than fighting his way to the top, but some things have to change to make a movie.
I am not going to list everything they did right, nor everything that they changed. I will note that I agree with Harry Knowles that they made a mistake by starting the movie on Mars with a narration to explain the political landscape of Barsoom. The movie would be greatly improved if they had started with Carter on Earth and let us learn about Barsoom politics when he does.
The movie has good effects and more humor than expected – well played humor, at that. I would have liked to see a banth, but at least they were mentioned.
And the ending was awesome.
I don’t know the actors and don’t care to look them up. Their performances were acceptable, but not outstanding. I found it a little distracting that Carter looked like Christian Bale when he had a beard, but looked more like Brandon Lee once he got a shave. This Dejah Thoris may not have been the most beautiful woman of two worlds, but the actress was easy on the eyes and her portrayal was not quite the Xena, Buffy, River Tam warrior princess that I’d been expecting due to other reviews. I can accept a woman with a sword killing swaths of bad guys as long as she doesn’t go ninja-fu on them.
To sum up: a good action movie that was reasonably faithful to the source material. Unless you are one of those guys that will never forgive Peter Jackson for leaving Tom Bombadil out of the Fellowship of the Ring, you’ll probably enjoy it as I did.
Bill Nighy is the world’s greatest assassin. Infamous and anonymous, no one knows who he is or what he looks like – only that he never fails. Until now.
Emily Blunt is a thief and con artist. She’s been quite successful until she pulls one over on the wrong person (Rupert Everett) and he hires the aforementioned Mr. Nighy to take care of her. And he plans to, really he does. But as he tracks her, he witnesses her captivating ability to manipulate the world around her, he finds himself unable to finish her off. Indeed, he abandons his job and reputation to become her staunch defender.
A cute, quirky action comedy with a dash of romance with strong performances from Nighy and Blunt, plus Rupert Grint demonstrates his ability to hold his own against the main characters.
I recommend it for 4 out of 5 stars.
Starring Nicolas Cage and Ron Perlman, this movie exceeded my expectations.
Of course, my expectations were pretty low given Mr. Cage’s most recent work. But the presence of Ron Perlman was enough for me to give it a chance and I am glad that I did. While not great cinema, the movie held my interest and was decently entertaining. I give it 3 stars out of 5.
Cage and Perlman are Crusader knights and very good at their work. Until the church leader begins targeting them against women and children. Then Cage calls it quits and walks away with faithful Perlman at his side. They head back home only to find plague and pestilence on their journey. As deserters, they are offered pardons if they agree to escort a confessed witch to a distant monastery for trial and some mystical process that will end the plague. Ah, but the witch is a young girl that plays to Cage’s sympathies even while leaving little doubt that she is not an innocent victim.
Cage actually tones down his performance and Perlman is great as usual. The additional characters are solid. Special effects won’t win any awards, but were adequate.
A decent sword and witchcraft movie.
Just saw this movie with my senior offspring – her choice. She has a thing for Daniel Radcliffe and I thought the trailer looked promising. Daniel is the only “star” in the film, but he has a solid supporting cast.
The Woman In Black is a refreshing throwback to traditional ghost stories. In an age of The Human Centipede, SAW, and remakes of everything from Friday the 13th to Nightmare on Elm Street, I really enjoyed watching a well told ghost story with tons of atmosphere, solid performances and plenty of well-played scares. Experiencing this movie is like visiting an exceptional haunted house on Halloween.
In fact, my only criticism of the movie is that the scares are performed so flawlessly, that I found myself watching the background rather than focusing on Mr. Radcliffe’s fine performance.
If you’re looking for things that go bump in the night rather than chainsaws and buckets of blood, The Woman In Black may be what you’re looking for.
I recommend it.
(Note to the Feds: I paid for our tickets and got nothing in return other than about 90 minutes of entertainment.)